Lies Sleeping by Ben Aaronovitch – I enjoyed this a lot, although it created at least as many questions as it answered. The copy editing was poor, which is disappointing but no worse than it has been for the other books of the series. The very ending was pretty ~meh~ to me, but it won’t stop me from reading whatever comes next.
The Good Neighbor by Maxwell King – biography of Fred Rogers. I’m not sure I can emphasize what a formative influence Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood was for me as a child. The documentary released earlier this year (not the bio-pic in production) impressed me and made me want to know more about him, and this biography is does not disappoint. I had not realized how influential and formative women were in his life; the women in his family, sure, but the professional women he worked with also. And it has been a relief to read without having Rogers be diminished. Of course he was human and flawed but very much embodied kindness and thoughtfulness toward children in a way that didn’t infantilize them or discount their fears and feelings.
Roxane Gay’s Difficult Women is up next, as is Rebecca Traister’s Good and Mad.
The Widows movie was good, but possibly not properly marketed. I did not see the twist in the middle coming at all. Now I want to read the book it was based on because I feel like there was backstory and possibly other plot that was edited out of the film for run-time. And also, hey, Chicago, I haven’t seen you in awhile.
The new Lisbeth Salander movie was face-paced and interesting. I have only read the first book of that series, so I can’t critique from an adaptation perspective. It was a thriller with fast cars, some guns, and creepy villains, filmed in a very noir or dour palette. I liked it enough that I may actually go back and try to read the series. Also, Claire Foy as Salander was excellent. One review I read after the fact complained that Salander was too flat and the film wasted her backstory, reducing the plot to Bond-like action. Eh, that is pretty harsh, but also: what’s wrong with having a Bond-like film with a woman as protagonist? Maybe dudes are tired of seeing Bond, but women seldom get to see a female Bond-type, and why must a female Bond-type be more developed than male Bond ever was in the films?