Book I read last week that I loved: Novik’s latest Temeraire book, Crucible of Gold
Several years and books ago, Novik hinted about the alternate history of the New World as a result of the existence of dragons, and in this book readers get to learn more. But better than that, the dull, dragging narrative and clunky pacing of the last book have vanished. While I understand intellectually that Tongues of Serpents was a set up book, it needed better editing and pacing. (Like the second and third books, which felt like a single long book chopped in two for marketing/business purposes, I wondered a little if it would have been better off coupled with either Victory of Eagles or Crucible for better pacing and plotting because it was a disappointment on its own — that seems to be the general consensus among the readers I know.)
Anyway, I love the way the Inca and Tswana dragons and their view of their human families are a foil for the European mindset about dragon ownership, and yet at the same time highlight the possessive natures of the dragons in Temeraire’s coterie.
One particular part left me goggle-eyed and startled, because I did NOT see that coming. Not shocked or offended in any manner and it sort of fits in retrospect, but just startled. Sort of the way I felt when JK Rowling casually announced that Dumbledore was gay.
And the ending was good, circling back perhaps to clear up some dangling threads in the next book.
The book I liked well enough: Fair Game by Patricia Briggs
I liked but didn’t love this book and I haven’t quite figured out why beyond a few general quibbles. First, Anna’s development from cowering and fearful in the first book of the series to organizing and managing in this third book. Told not shown, and not particularly believable to me given how hard Briggs worked to present her as hesitant, self-doubting and reticent. Second, in the early books, Anna’s delicacy and short stature were made much of IIRC but in this book she is average height or taller. Did she suddenly have a growth spurt after maturity? Lastly, I’m growing uncomfortable with serial killers and rapists in urban fantasy and Briggs’ use of rape and/or threatened sexual assault to the female narrators and characters in her books in particular. It’s all down to personal taste and YMMV, obviously, since a lot of other readers really loved this book.
The meh book: Scandalous Women: The Lives and Loves of History’s Most Notorious Women by Elizabeth Kerri Mahon
Some of the entries in this short survey are obvious (Joan of Arc); others are less so (Carry Nation); and still others are original and inspiring (Ida B. Wells). The tone and style are extremely casual and informal, with the author making comparisons to Lady Gaga, Britney Spears, etc. — very pop culture referential, as if the author felt she had to equate each woman It’s hard to condense the history of a complex character like Eleanor of Aquitaine to 15 pages or less, and the difficulty is very apparent here; in many of the biographies, the emphasis is on the trivial and the titillating rather than substance, which is an unfortunate waste of an opportunity. There’s no significant analysis and the approach is not serious , and the bibliography and citations are somewhat lacking IMO. Perhaps I’m the wrong audience; maybe a 20 year old who knows very little about history would be fascinated by this introduction to the wild women of days gone by. Or maybe they could find the same information at Wikipedia for free.